|
Post by Josh on Jul 30, 2009 1:01:51 GMT -5
Me and one of my friends were arguing and I said that the picture was real, and she said it looked like a drawing. What do you guys think? Also, please say why you think it's real or fake =)
|
|
|
Post by Simbacat on Jul 30, 2009 5:47:44 GMT -5
It looks like a drawing to me, something about the eyes just doesn't look right
|
|
|
Post by Mako on Jul 30, 2009 9:31:46 GMT -5
Hm, I think it's a photo. When I searched the image on Tineye it led me to a stock photo site HERE.
|
|
|
Post by Zekumi on Jul 30, 2009 13:03:01 GMT -5
It looks like a drawing to me, something about the eyes just doesn't look right That's what I was thinking. The eyes look off-center/slightly skew ... Not in a way that couldn't be physically possible, but it still gave me the impression of a drawing. That's something I see very commonly with artists doing something heavily realistic. I also thought the white in the middle of the forehead was lacking definition and detail, which again gave me the impression of a drawing.
|
|
|
Post by Rinkái on Jul 30, 2009 13:05:28 GMT -5
It looked like a photo in the smaller size, but when I followed Mako's link, I thought drawing.
... Then again, it COULD be a photo that has been manipulated digitally? To look more 'perfect'.
|
|
|
Post by Neco on Jul 30, 2009 13:20:14 GMT -5
The fluff on the chest definitely makes me think digital job. The reason being that none of the other fur is blowing back like that, and the ears would be in a different position, not falling forward as if nothing's going on. And looking at the very top of the head, it looks like someone may have smudged the colors to make them smoother. And the lighting on the butt bothers me T_T
|
|
|
Post by petzlover35 on Jul 30, 2009 15:16:02 GMT -5
The eyes just don't look right to me.....
|
|
|
Post by Poppy on Jul 30, 2009 15:20:14 GMT -5
Drawing. n.n Something about the fur just looks kind of fake...
|
|
|
Post by Mako on Jul 30, 2009 15:42:58 GMT -5
I found a link to the portfolio of the guy who took the photo of the dog here. It may have been enhanced some, but it's definitely a photo. ^^
|
|
|
Post by Bayn ♥s Aequitas on Jul 30, 2009 16:26:45 GMT -5
^ That's what I was just thinking, it looks too refined to be a photo, but too realistic to be a drawing. ^w^'
|
|
|
Post by Neco on Jul 30, 2009 21:17:52 GMT -5
I found a link to the portfolio of the guy who took the photo of the dog here. It may have been enhanced some, but it's definitely a photo. ^^ LOL I love how one of the dogs is named Bastard. [/end immaturity] For some reason, this picture still looks like it's been heavily touched up digitally than the other ones. It just has that manipulation feel... x.x
|
|
oh reelee?
Petz Rescuer
This member is banned.
100%
Posts: 274
|
Post by oh reelee? on Jul 30, 2009 22:28:38 GMT -5
To me, the head looks totally digitally drawn. Like, 100% pretty much, along with the chest, but then it looks more realistic on the back/side of the dog.
|
|
|
Post by Ela @ GK on Jul 30, 2009 23:48:40 GMT -5
Looks like a digital photograph that has had it's properties tampered with in a photo editing program to remove digital noise and lens distortions as well as to smooth out flaws. Looking at the work of the man (that Mako posted) seems all his photographs are in fact digitally altered as all of them have a certain smoothness and flawlessness that you don't see in the real world only in enhanced photos.
|
|
|
Post by Kenzie on Aug 3, 2009 12:16:13 GMT -5
Haha tbh, real or fake, I think the dog looks ugly :x I've seen muchhh prettier Brittanys before.
I roll with the manipulated crowd for my guess~
|
|
|
Post by Croag on Aug 3, 2009 12:26:04 GMT -5
Photo.
|
|